Price Elasticity of Demand: Formula, CPG Benchmarks & Worked Examples
The fundamental measure of how consumers respond to price changes.
What is Price Elasticity?
Price Elasticity of Demand (PED) measures the percentage change in quantity demanded resulting from a one percent change in price. It answers the most fundamental question in pricing: "If I change my price, what happens to my volume?"
The sign convention
Elasticity is almost always negative. When price goes up, demand goes down. By convention in FMCG, practitioners often express it as a positive number (e.g., "elasticity of 2.0"), but the direction is understood: a 1 percent price increase leads to a roughly 2 percent volume decline.
Point vs arc elasticity
Pricing analytics distinguishes between point elasticity (responsiveness at a specific price) and arc elasticity (average responsiveness over a range). Both are essential, but they serve different purposes. Point elasticity is theoretical precision. Arc elasticity is what you actually measure from real sales data.
An elasticity of exactly -1.0 is the break-even point for revenue. The volume lost precisely offsets the higher price, leaving total revenue unchanged. Above and below that threshold sit two very different pricing regimes.
The Core Formulas
Three formulas matter. The first is the discrete approximation you compute from any two observed price points. The second is the textbook continuous form. The third is the one you actually use on real data.
Point elasticity (discrete approximation)
Use when you have a baseline volume Q and a small price change ΔP. Reasonable for moves of less than 10 percent.
Point elasticity (continuous form)
The textbook calculus form. Useful when you have a fitted demand function Q(P).
Arc elasticity (midpoint method)
The version used when you have two observed price points (P1, Q1) and (P2, Q2) and want a single elasticity that does not depend on which direction you ran the change. This is what most price tests report.
The three regimes
- Inelastic (
|e| < 1): volume drops less than price rises. Revenue increases with a price hike. - Unit elastic (
|e| = 1): the break-even point. Revenue stays flat through small price changes. - Elastic (
|e| > 1): volume drops more than price rises. Revenue falls with a price hike.
This is the single most-cited number in pricing, drawn from a large meta-analysis of brand-level studies. Most mainstream FMCG categories sit between -1.5 and -2.5 at the brand level. Premium tiers run -0.8 to -1.5. Value tiers and private label run -2.5 to -3.5. The practical ceiling commercial teams use for pricing decisions is around -1.7 to -1.8.
Biscuits Category: a Real Scenario
CrunchField Premium Cookies are priced at $4.29 per pack, selling 50,000 units per month. The category manager estimates a price elasticity of -1.8.
Scenario: a 5 percent price increase to $4.50
The volume math
- Expected volume change: -1.8 x 5% = -9.0%
- New volume: 50,000 x (1 - 0.09) = 45,500 units
The revenue math
- Revenue before: $4.29 x 50,000 = $214,500
- Revenue after: $4.50 x 45,500 = $204,750
Because |ε| > 1.0, the volume loss more than offsets the higher price. This price increase destroys revenue. The straightforward read on the elasticity coefficient says the move fails.
How Practitioners Use It
In FMCG, elasticity is the single most important pricing input. Four working rules separate the people who use it well from the people who quote one number and walk away.
Calibrate to the segment, not the category
Most mainstream FMCG categories sit between -1.5 and -2.5 at brand level. Premium segments tend to be less elastic (-0.8 to -1.5). Value and private label tend to be more elastic (-2.5 to -3.5). The category mean is a starting point, not the answer.
Elasticity is not constant
It changes with the competitive environment, the economic cycle, the season, and the magnitude of the price change. A 3 percent increase might face an elasticity of -1.8, while a 15 percent increase in the same category could show -3.0 because you have pushed beyond psychological thresholds.
Triangulate, never trust one number
Three sources should agree before you commit a price decision:
- Econometric model fitted to historical sales and price data
- Price test run in matched-store cells over a controlled window
- Category manager intuition informed by competitive context
When all three disagree, dig deeper. When two agree and one is an outlier, trust the two and investigate the outlier.
Base elasticity and promotional elasticity are different numbers
A brand can be elastic on promo (responsive to a 20 percent off feature) but inelastic on base price (a 5 percent shelf-price rise barely moves volume). Or vice versa.
Continue exploring
Put this concept to work
See Price Elasticity of Demand in action
RGM Academy lets you pull the levers yourself in an interactive simulator, with a senior AI RGM strategist coaching every decision you make.
Open the Price Elasticity of Demand interactive sandbox